Understanding AI Agents - The Next Wave of Automated Internet Activity


Artificial intelligence is reshaping not only what software can do, but how it operates across the internet. While in the recent past, AI’s most visible impact on web activity came in the form of AI crawlers that collected and indexed content at scale for model training, a more complex shift is underway. AI agents, systems that are capable of taking goal-directed actions autonomously on behalf of users, are increasingly being adopted by consumers to interact over the internet. Understanding this critical development and its business implications is crucial for organizations with which digital properties they engage with.

What are AI Agents?

An AI agent, in the context of internet activity, is an AI-powered software system that uses an LLM as its reasoning engine to interact and complete tasks across the web autonomously, on behalf of a human user. The AI agent ecosystem is expanding rapidly, with offerings such as ChatGPT Agent, Perplexity Comet, Manus, Browseruse etc. Agentic capabilities are increasingly being embedded into widely used consumer products, and adoption is accelerating. Its differentiation from conventional bots and crawlers lies in the following characteristics:

Autonomy: AI agents operate with minimal human oversight. Once given an objective, they pursue it independently, providing results or outcomes to the user rather than requiring approval at each step.

Multi-step actions: Unlike conversational AI systems that respond to user queries, AI agents take sequences of actions across the internet to achieve thier goal, navigating across multiple sites and services over time.

Goal achievement: AI agents operate to achieve goals with end-to-end workflows, not complete individual tasks. A user can instruct an agent to accomplish things like researching and buying products, purchasing tickets, or completing end-to-end transactions. The agent determines in real-time how to achieve the goal through reasoning, rather than following fixed paths.

Adaptability: AI agents can respond dynamically to unexpected situations that occur while executing a workflow by leveraging their reasoning capabilities. If a page loads differently or if they come across an unexpected step in between, the agent can adjust its strategy to achieve the desired objective.

How AI Agents Differ from AI Crawlers

Over the last few years, with the rise of AI platforms and LLMs, a new category of web traffic has emerged in the form of AI crawlers. These systems traverse the internet at scale, extracting and indexing web content to build training data for LLM models and support AI-powered search services.

However, despite AI crawlers generating significant traffic volumes and raising concerns around content usage, they are a fundamentally familiar type of automated system. One that extracts information but does not take actions on the website, and is for the most part attributable to known operators.

The Critical Differences

Objective: AI crawlers only read and extract content, but AI agents plan and act autonomously to complete actions and workflows. An AI agent visiting a retail website may not only read product information but also add items to the cart, enter payment details, and complete a purchase – all within authenticated sessions on behalf of the user.

Interaction: AI crawlers read static content, or at most render pages to capture dynamically generated content. AI agents interact with applications – submitting forms, clicking UI elements, navigating authenticated flows, and engaging with application logic.

Identification: AI crawlers typically identify themselves through recognized user-agent strings and in many cases, through published IP address ranges. AI agents by contrast, may present as ordinary user traffic, since they can operate within user sessions, making their identification and attribution considerably more difficult.

Attribution: The major AI crawler operators are a small, identifiable set of well-known companies. The AI agent ecosystem, while including many of these companies, is more diverse and decentralized, with the population of agents interacting with any given organization’s digital properties increasing with the growing adoption by consumers.

Besides all the above, another dimension is that AI agents on the internet act directly on behalf of users, unlike AI crawler traffic, and their interactions can affect business outcomes directly. This creates strategic implications with a broader business impact on security, revenue, customer experience, compliance etc.

Why This Matters to Businesses

Customer Experience and Revenue Impact

As AI agent use becomes more prevalent and gains adoption, outright blocking all agent-driven interactions to ensure security could drive away customers whose AI agents cannot complete a purchase, fulfill a transaction, or retrieve needed details. This friction can lead to a poor customer experience, eroding trust, and at scale, representing measurable lost revenue to businesses.

Business and Operational Risk

While legitimate AI agent activity deserves to be allowed, unauthorized agent activity introduces a higher magnitude of risks. Unmanaged agent traffic through AI agents operating at scale can consume infrastructure resources at rates that cause a material impact to online platforms. AI agents that operate without appropriate constraints and exploit established mechanisms can take actions that could create reputational damage when traced back to an online platform.

Security Risk

AI agents that navigate authenticated environments within user sessions, or through users who grant agents broad permissions without fully understanding the implications, can gain unauthorized access to sensitive data. Personal, financial, or organizational data may be accessed, manipulated, and exfiltrated at scale – with the activity appearing as normal user behavior to conventional security systems. Malicious actors can deploy highly capable agents as an attack tool targeting online platforms.

Compliance Risk

AI agents acting on behalf of users may access data in ways that are difficult to attribute at the granularity that regulations such as GDPR, CCPA, and sector-specific frameworks require. The inability to demonstrate adequate control over data access can represent compliance exposure. Organizations operating in regulated industries such as Financial Services and Insurance sectors etc., can face compounded complexity in assessing their exposure.

Conclusion

AI agents represent a completely new category of internet traffic, one that combines the scale of bot activity with the autonomous, adaptive, and goal-directed nature of intelligent AI systems. The implications for organizations span security, customer experience, competitive strategy, and analytics, among others. These implications are not speculative, but a reality with the AI agent interactions already occurring across digital properties today, with its significance growing as agent adoption grows.

Dhanesh Ramachandran

Dhanesh Ramachandran

Dhanesh is a Product Marketing Manager at Radware, responsible for driving marketing efforts for Radware Bot Manager. He brings several years of experience and a deep understanding of market dynamics and customer needs in the cybersecurity industry. Dhanesh is skilled at translating complex cybersecurity concepts into clear, actionable insights for customers. He holds an MBA in Marketing from IIM Trichy.

Related Articles

Contact Radware Sales

Our experts will answer your questions, assess your needs, and help you understand which products are best for your business.

Already a Customer?

We’re ready to help, whether you need support, additional services, or answers to your questions about our products and solutions.

Locations
Get Answers Now from KnowledgeBase
Get Free Online Product Training
Engage with Radware Technical Support
Join the Radware Customer Program

Get Social

Connect with experts and join the conversation about Radware technologies.

Blog
Security Research Center
CyberPedia